Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  S275 S290 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page S275 S290 Next Page
Page Background

ligaments. This reduced his pain significantly and allowed him to

return to function.

Discussion:

Interspinous ligament injury is an under recognized eti-

ology of back pain. Cadaveric studies have demonstrated that

interspinous ligaments are the weakest of the spinal ligaments and

are subjected to the greatest strain during flexion and extension of

the spine. The diagnosis is largely clinical as imaging modalities such

as MRI have shown varying reliability. Prolotherapy, or proliferative

therapy, is gaining recognition as a treatment modality for tendin-

opathy as well as ligamentous laxity but its use for the treatment of

interspinous ligament injury is poorly described. Further studies are

warranted to explore the presentation and diagnosis of interspinous

ligament injury and the use of dextrose prolotherapy in its

treatment.

Conclusions:

Physiatrists should recognize interspinous ligament

injury as a potential source of chronic back pain in conjunction with or

separate from other diagnoses, such as degenerative disc disease or

radiculopathy. Prolotherapy injections may be beneficial as both an

adjuvant and primary treatment modality.

Level of Evidence:

Level V

Poster 449:

Resolution of Refractory, Cancer-Related Neuropathic

Pain with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor: A Case

Report

Paolo G. Jorge, MD (Loma Linda University Health, Rancho

Cucamonga, CA, United States), Colby Vongchaichinsri, MD,

Scott Strum, MD

Disclosures:

Paolo Jorge: I Have No Relevant Financial Relationships

To Disclose

Case/Program Description:

A 36-year-old man with worsening

chest discomfort was found to have left lung metastatic adeno-

carcinoma with malignant pleural effusion. He underwent a left

pneumonectomy, with partial resection of the left 6th rib, fol-

lowed by Intensity

e

Modulated Radiation for 30 days. Surgical pa-

thology showed Exon 19 EGFR deletion and TP53 mutation. Three

months post-radiation therapy he presented to chronic pain clinic

with burning, electrical, 7/10, neuropathic pain. Intercostal nerve

blocks and a pain regimen consisting of acetaminophen, gaba-

pentin, ibuprofen, oxycodone IR, and oxycodone ER provided only

minimal, temporary relief. CT chest shortly after pain clinic visit

revealed new lesions in the right lung. Afatinib, a tyrosine kinase

inhibitor (TKI), was started by oncology for its antineoplastic

effects.

Setting:

Chronic Pain Clinic.

Results:

At pain clinic follow up 2 months later, neuropathic pain was

completely resolved, with only mild left-sided stiffness and discomfort

rated 1/10. All narcotics and analgesics were self-discontinued prior to

the visit and he reported significant quality of life improvement.

Adverse effects of afatinib included diarrhea and paronychia, both

reportedly tolerable. He was referred to physical therapy and

continued on afatinib with the anticipation of long-term pain relief

before possible resistance.

Discussion:

Chronic, debilitating neuropathic pain is a common

sequela related to cancer that is associated with depression,

decreased function, and poor quality of life. Chest wall pain in the

setting of lung cancer is often refractory to traditional pain regi-

mens. Studies have shown upregulation of protein kinases HER2 and

MAPK, activated by EGFR, in neuropathic pain. Pilot studies, using

TKIs to inhibit EGFR and HER2, have shown clinically significant pain

relief and quality of life improvement in the setting of neuropathic

pain.

Conclusions:

This case demonstrates the efficacy of TKIs in providing

complete resolution of refractory, cancer-related neuropathic pain.

Further studies exploring this novel treatment for neuropathic pain

may be beneficial.

Level of Evidence:

Level V

Poster 450:

Unexpected Motor Responses with Motor Stimulus

Testing during Lumbar Radiofrequency Neurotomy: A

Case Series

Wilson J. Chang, MD MPH (Stanford Medical Center), Lisa Huynh, MD,

Matt Smuck, MD, Ashley S. Maybin, MD, Byron J. Schneider, MD,

FAAPMR

Disclosures:

Wilson Chang: I Have No Relevant Financial Relationships

To Disclose

Case/Program Description:

Three cases of unexpected motor stim-

ulus responses during lumbar radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN) despite

proper electrode placement at the expected location of the L5 dorsal

ramus were identified. All patients underwent bilateral lumbar medial

branch RFN after two successful medial branch blocks. All procedures

were performed by board certified PM&R physicians with fellowship

training in interventional spine and done in accordance with Spine

Intervention Society technique. In each case, proper lead placement

was confirmed at the expected location of the L5 dorsal ramus with

multiple fluoroscopic views. Unexpected muscle contraction of the

ipsilateral lower extremity was observed after routine motor stimu-

lation (2Hz, 0.5-2.0 V). In two cases, RFN was performed once no lower

extremity contractions but only multifidus contractions were observed

after the electrode was withdrawn. In one case, the RFN was not

performed due to a persistent motor response after multiple reposi-

tioning; only L3 and L4 medial branches were completed. Post-pro-

cedure, all cases demonstrated intact lower extremity motor strength

in all myotomes.

Setting:

Two academic outpatient clinic medical centers.

Results:

Two cases had post-procedure follow up at 2-5 weeks. Both

demonstrated intact lower extremity neurological exam and reported

60-70% improvement of their index axial low back pain. One reported

new unilateral radicular pain which resolved after one week. One had

known premorbid radicular pain that presented 2 weeks prior to RFN

and symptoms remained unchanged.

Discussion:

In theory, this unexpected motor response could be due to

anomalous innervations or atypical location of the ventral ramus.

Motor stimulus testing helped demonstrate the proximity of the

electrode to these innervations, ultimately preventing the neurotomy

involving the lower extremities.

Conclusions:

These cases highlight the importance of motor stimula-

tion during lumbar RFN as a safeguard to prevent unintended neuro-

tomy of nerves whose muscles are normally innervated by the L5

ventral ramus nerve.

Level of Evidence:

Level IV

PEDIATRICS POSTER HALL: CASE REPORTS

Poster 451:

Functional Gains After Sirolimus Treatment of

Congenital Lymphovascular Malformations

Jessica R. Pruente, MD (Univ of Colorado SOM, Chicago, IL, United

States), Shubra Mukherjee, MD

Disclosures:

Jessica Pruente: I Have No Relevant Financial Relation-

ships To Disclose

Case/Program Description:

Complex vascular malformations affect

0.8-1% of the general population. These can cause pain, delayed

milestones, and functional deficits in children. Sirolimus is used to

S275

Abstracts / PM R 9 (2017) S131-S290