Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  S163 S290 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page S163 S290 Next Page
Page Background

electromyography, electrical stimulation and ultrasound), electromy-

ography was the most frequently used (39.5%

e

61.5% of treatment

sessions). Across all treatments, 91.1% of physicians and 82.3% of pa-

tients reported being satisfied or extremely satisfied that treatment

helped manage spasticity; 84.6% of physicians and 74.8% of patients

reported that the treatment benefit was sustained, and 97.4% of

physicians and 89.8% of patients would definitely or probably continue

onabotulinumtoxinA. 28.0% (n

¼

205) of patients reported 1 adverse

event (AE) and 10.3% (n

¼

75) reported a serious AE. No new safety

concerns were identified.

Conclusions:

One-year results demonstrate the safety and effective-

ness of onabotulinumtoxinA for spasticity in clinical practice. Further

analyses will explore clinical and burden outcomes and differences

across etiology and presentation.

Level of Evidence:

Level IV

Poster 80:

Feasibility and Validity of a Low-Cost Simulator in

Driver Assessment after Stroke

David B. Carr, MD (Washington Univ in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri,

United States), Annie C. Harmon, PhD, Tina Nolte, BA, James Stowe,

PhD

Disclosures:

David B. Carr, MD: I Have No Relevant Financial Re-

lationships To Disclose

Objective:

This study compares and contrasts the use of research

and racing simulation in a stroke sample and determined their cor-

relates with psychometric tests associated with impaired driving

performance. This work is designed to lay groundwork for future

rehabilitation efforts for adoption in the home setting or during

recovery of acute neurologic illnesses such as stroke and brain

injury.

Design:

Observational analytic, cross-sectional design.

Setting:

Outpatient rehabilitation facility using paper/pencil and

computer-based psychometric testing, a research driving simulator,

and a low-cost racing simulator.

Participants:

43 adults with stroke were recruited and 39 were

retained for analyses (4 participants failed screening criteria on psy-

chometric tests).

Interventions:

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures:

Patients were assessed on clinical exam

(NIHSS, Motricity Index; vision; hearing screen; stroke severity);

psychometric tests (cognition, psychomotor processing speed, vi-

suospatial ability, executive function, and attention); on the

research simulator that evaluated traffic safety behavior in a vari-

ety of scenarios (collision avoidance, appropriate judgment, etc);

and on a low-cost racing simulator that evaluated driving

performance parameters (lap time, standard deviation of lateral

position, etc).

Results:

In general, psychometric performance was related to per-

formance in both the research and racing simulators (e.g., Montreal

Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]) scores and mean racing simulator lap

time [rs

¼

-.44, p

¼

.025]). Binary Logistic Regression was used to

understand the value of simulator telemetry data in predicting a low-

risk classification on a psychometric battery known to be related to on-

road driving assessment outcomes (pass/fail). Using simulator data,

81.8% of participants were correctly classified as being either low- or

high-risk of failing an on-road evaluation, and the model explained

68.2% (Nagelkerke R2) of the variance.

Conclusions:

Low-cost, high-fidelity simulation has matured in

recent years, and this technology should be studied as a potential

rehabilitation screen to return individuals to safe and active

driving.

Level of Evidence:

Level III

Poster 81:

PM&R Consults for Combined TBI/SCI Patients in the

Shock Trauma ICU Impact Ventilation Days, Morbidity,

and Disposition: A Retrospective Study

Cole R. Linville, DO, MBA (Univ of TX-UT Houston, Houston, Texas,

United States), Meggan Morris, SLP, Jay J. Chacko, MS-IV,

Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez, MD, FAAPMR, Argyrios Stampas, MD

Disclosures:

Cole Linville: I Have No Relevant Financial Relationships

To Disclose

Objective:

Determine differences in characteristics, complications,

length of stay and disposition for combined traumatic brain injury and

spinal cord injury (SCI) patients admitted to the shock trauma inten-

sive care unit (STICU) who received and did not receive a physical

medicine and rehabilitation (PMR) consult.

Design:

A retrospective clinical study was conducted of acute trauma

patients admitted to the STICU at a Level 1 trauma center with acute

care stay days of at least 14 days. Patients admitted from January 1,

2013, through December 31, 2013, who were 16 years of age or older

with a spinal cord injury diagnosis were included in this study. General

characteristics, complications and disposition were then recorded and

analyzed for these patients.

Setting:

Level I Trauma Center.

Participants:

36 patients met inclusion criteria.

Interventions:

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures:

Demographics, characteristics, complica-

tions, length of stay, disposition.

Results:

36 patients had a combined TBI/SCI. There were no signifi-

cant differences in patient characteristics if PMR was or was not

consulted. Complications for combined TBI/SCI patients with a PMR

consult, compared to those without a PMR consult

e

dysphagia

requiring PEG/PEJ placement: 15 vs. 0 (p

¼

.01). There were no other

significant differences in other complications including pneumonia,

UTI, PE, DVT, or tracheostomy placement. There were no significant

differences in length of stay, however, patients with a PMR consult had

more ventilation free days compared to those without a PMR consult:

13.5 vs. 8.5 (p

¼

.04). Disposition for combined TBI/SCI patients with a

PMR consult, compared to those without a PMR consult - Inpatient

rehabilitation: 14 vs. 0 (p

¼

.01); LTAC: 5 vs. 4 (p

¼

.08); SNF: 3 vs.

0 (p

¼

1); home: 3 vs. 2 (p

¼

.1).

Conclusions:

This retrospective study shows combined TBI/SCI pa-

tients with a PMR consult were more likely to require gastrostomy tube

placement, had more ventilation free days, and were more likely to

discharge to inpatient rehabilitation.

Level of Evidence:

Level II

Poster 82:

Patient-Centered Technique for Ultrasound-Guided

Muscle Injections in the Forearm of Patients with

Severe Spasticity

George Deng (Univ of Manitoba)

Disclosures:

George Deng: I Have No Relevant Financial Relationships

To Disclose

Objective:

This project serves to demonstrate the relative muscle

positioning under ultrasound between a forearm in a modified

anatomical position and in an upper motor neuron injury pattern to

create a teaching resource.

Design:

Videos of the ultrasound probe and ultrasound image are

recorded while systematically activating the flexor digitorum brevis,

flexor digitorum longus, and flexor carpi ulnaris muscle. Video and

raster graphic editors are used to synchronize the two videos and to

highlight each forearm muscle.

Setting:

Videos were taken in a spasticity clinic.

S163

Abstracts / PM R 9 (2017) S131-S290