Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  S178 S290 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page S178 S290 Next Page
Page Background

Objective:

Previous studies by other researchers have shown promise

for robotic rehabilitation to improve ankle mobility and strength in

patients with cerebral palsy. We plan to build on this work and develop

a low-cost robotic system for rehabilitation for children with cerebral

palsy. Our long-term goal is to enable rehabilitation in the home with

quantitative data sent to a central server that is monitored by the

clinical team.

Design:

We built a three degree of freedom robot along with an

associated control system. An airplane video game was constructed

using the open source gaming software Unity and connected to the

robotic system. The range of motion is configurable and the foot of the

user becomes the “joystick” that is responsible for controlling the

plane to fly through a series of hoops. We present the clinical feasi-

bility study for the use of the robot as a therapeutic tool.

Setting:

Pediatric outpatient clinic.

Participants:

5 children with cerebral palsy, ages 4-13 years.

Interventions:

Children were positioned in a Rifton Activity Chair so

that one affected foot could be strapped into the robot to be used as

the controller for the video game. Limits to the robot were set by the

PT to make use of the controller possible to fly the plane through the

hoops in the videogame. The game was made progressively more

difficult, encouraging the patient to increase use and range of motion

of the affected foot.

Main Outcome Measures:

Tolerance, enjoyment, ability to play the

videogame.

Results:

All participants were enthusiastic users of the robot as a

“joystick” to play the video game. They participated eagerly in ther-

apy sessions and were happy to “get to the game time.” There were no

incidents or accidents that caused us to stop the trials.

Conclusions:

PedBOT can be tolerated by children as an adjunct to

therapy for cerebral palsy.

Level of Evidence:

Level IV

Poster 141:

Pilot use of the Social Skills Rating System in Children

with Traumatic Brain Injury

Mi Ran Shin, MD (Johns Hopkins University School of Med),

Stacy J. Suskauer, MD

Disclosures:

Mi Ran Shin: I Have No Relevant Financial Relationships

To Disclose

Objective:

Use of the Social Skills Rating System (SSRS) has not

been reported in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Our goal was to

examine how youth with TBI scored on this measure in comparison

to published norms and scores of children with attention deficit

hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the relationship between SSRS

scores and parent-report measures of executive function and

quality of life (QOL).

Design:

Longitudinal observational study.

Setting:

Pediatric rehabilitation research center.

Participants:

Children aged 10-17 at injury with mild (53%) or

moderate-severe (47%) TBI; 15 children were evaluated 2 and 12

months post-TBI.

Interventions:

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures:

SSRS: standardized scores for social skills

(SS) and problem behaviors (PB) and raw subscale scores for cooper-

ation, assertion, responsibility, and self-control. Behavior Rating In-

ventory of Executive Function (BRIEF): Global Executive

Composite(GEC) t-score. Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL)

(12 month visit only): General Health score

Results:

SSRS scores fell within the normal range at 2 and 12

months post-injury. Lowest scores/greatest range were seen in the

cooperation subscale at 2 months. For the cooperation subscale, TBI

cohort scores were between the norms and scores for children with

ADHD; for other scores the TBI cohort was similar to norms. SS was

negatively correlated with GEC at 2 months (r

¼

-0.628) and 12

months (r

¼

-0.632); better social skills was associated with fewer

executive function concerns. SS was positively correlated with

PedsQL (r

¼

0.817, p

<

.01); stronger social skills were associated with

better quality of life.

Conclusions:

This is the first report of use of the SSRS in TBI. In this

small pilot sample, the group as a whole performed well, though

some children had lower scores, particularly on the cooperation

subscale. SSRS scores were associated with other parent-report

measures. Future work should examine the utility of this measure in

larger groups of children with TBI including those with more severe

injuries.

Level of Evidence:

Level II

PRACTICE MANAGEMENT & LEADERSHIP POSTER HALL:

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Poster 142:

Correlates of Participation in Patient Experience

Survey Among Patients with Orthopedic Conditions in

an Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility

Sharon Bushi (East Brunswick, NJ, USA), Mooyeon Oh-Park, MD

Disclosures:

Sharon Bushi: I Have No Relevant Financial Relationships

To Disclose

Objective:

Patient experience has been increasingly emphasized as

an important parameter of quality care in various healthcare settings.

Although healthcare providers use patient experience surveys (PES) as

tools to capture the voice of patients, the results may vary depending

on which patients respond to the survey. The objective of this study

was to identify the correlates of participation in patient experience

survey (PES) among patients with orthopedic conditions in inpatient

rehabilitation facility (IRF).

Design:

Retrospective data analysis.

Setting:

Free standing IRF.

Participants:

Patients admitted with orthopedic diagnoses (arthro-

plasty, fractures without neurological injuries) for a 12 month period.

Interventions:

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures:

Participation in patient experience surveys

(34 multiple choice questions) which were offered to all the patients

upon discharge.

Results:

A total of 2,631 patients (65% female) with orthopedic

diagnoses were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 1,399

(53%) participated in the PES. These participants were found to be

younger [(mean age standard deviation (SD), 70.91.x 11.9 vs

72.3 12.8), with higher cognitive functional independence mea-

sure (FIM) scores at discharge (31.5 3.6 vs 29.8 4.9) compared

to non-participants. Also, a higher proportion of participants

were married (56% vs 48%) and discharged home (91% vs 83%)

than nonparticipants. There was no difference in gender and

ethnicity between participants and nonparticipants. In multivar-

iate logistic regression analysis, independent correlates of

participation in PES include younger age [odds ratio (OR), 95%

confidence interval (CI), 1.01, 1.00-1.02], marital status (OR, 95%

CI, 1.29, 1.09-1.51), and cognitive FIM scores at discharge (OR,

95% CI, 1.06, 1.04-1.09).

Conclusions:

This study showed that older patients with lower

cognitive function, or those with limited family support may be un-

derrepresented in the PES results. Patient experience has tremendous

implications for resource allocation and medical administration.

Systematic efforts to capture the voices of this underrepresented

population, therefore, are desired to provide ideal patient centered

care.

Level of Evidence:

Level III

S178

Abstracts / PM R 9 (2017) S131-S290