Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  S214 S290 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page S214 S290 Next Page
Page Background

Results:

Differential diagnosis included compression of the radial nerve,

superficial radial nerve, lateral cutaneous nerve of the forearm and

common extensor tendinopathy. Electrodiagnostic evaluations of the

radial sensory and motor nerves as well as the lateral cutaneous nerve of

the forearm were unremarkable bilaterally. Musculoskeletal ultrasound

evaluation identified a well-defined unilobular hypoechoic cyst measuring

approximately 2.05 cm 1.6 cm on the anterolateral aspect of the elbow

joint, causing compression of the identified radial nerve at the elbow prior

to its bifurcation into its deep and superficial branches. Patient underwent

ultrasound-guided cyst aspiration of 2.5 mL of serous fluid with notable

immediate resolution of pressure sensation and sensory symptoms.

Discussion:

This is an atypical case of an elbow cyst causing radial

nerve compression neuropathy presenting with neurologic distribution

other than the typical changes at the radial dorsum of hand, or sig-

nificant wrist extensor weakness. As previously reported in literature,

improvements of symptoms were achieved with ambulatory procedure

such as ultrasound-guided aspiration.

Conclusions:

Anterior elbow cysts may cause radial nerve entrapment

neuropathy and could present with atypical sensory symptomatology;

however, these may be safely treated in ambulatory setting.

Level of Evidence:

Level V

Poster 258:

Limbus Vertebra, A True Cause of Chronic Back Pain?

Yonghoon Lee, MD (Albert Einstein Col of Med, Bronx, NY, United

States), Eathar Saad, MD

Disclosures:

Yonghoon Lee, MD: I Have No Relevant Financial Re-

lationships To Disclose

Case/Program Description:

A 27-year-old man presented with inter-

mittent left sided paralumbar pain over 2 years. The onset of the lower

back pain was unrelated to recent or distant injury. The pain was

reproducible with lumbar flexion, not responsive to NSAID treatment,

and was not associated paresthesia. The initial lumbar x-ray showed an

anterior limbus vertebra at L4 level. Subsequently MRI revealed an

anterior limbus vertebra (ALV) at L4 with bulging discs at L2-L3, L3-L4,

L5-S1, a slight foraminal narrowing at L3-L4, and a spinal canal nar-

rowing at L5-S1 level without spinal cord compression. The patient was

initiated with conservative management including physical therapy.

Setting:

Adult general rehabilitation outpatient clinic.

Results:

The physical therapy only helped with minimal pain relief.

Discussion:

Limbus vertebra is produced by injury to immature vertebral

body leading to a marginal intra-vertebral body herniation of nucleus pul-

posus material around a separated triangular bone segment. Its pathogen-

esis is related to Scheuermann’s disease, which usually coexists. The clinical

significance of ALV has been increasingly debatable. Some studies consid-

ered ALV as an incidental finding. A recent discussion noted ALV was found

mostly in symptomatic patients. Also, the relationship between interver-

tebral disc degeneration (IDD) and ALV were discussed, suggesting ALV as a

predictor for IDD in athletes. The intradiscal pathology could cause a

disturbance in spine biomechanics and increase stress on adjacent struc-

tureswithassociatedpain. However, asystemic reviewonMRI findings of IDD

failed to suggested lower back pain is attributable to underlying pathology.

Conclusions:

The direct clinical role of ALV still remain unclear but its

presence in the setting of lower back pain warrants a CT or MRI study

to evaluate adjacent structures. This case is interesting for the pre-

sentation of chronic back pain with simultaneous radiographic findings

of ALV and IDD, while the true cause of the pain remains debatable.

Level of Evidence:

Level V

Poster 259:

Occult Hip Fracture: A Case Report

Isaac P. Syrop, MD (NY Presby Hosp/Columbia/Cornell, Chappaqua,

NY, United States), George C. Christolias, MD

Disclosures:

Isaac Syrop: I Have No Relevant Financial Relationships

To Disclose

Case/Program Description:

An 81-year-old man, with a pertinent his-

tory of osteoporosis, presents to an outpatient physiatrist with right hip

pain. His right hip pain began 3 weeks prior with no inciting event. As time

elapsed his pain worsened, associated with a marked decline in function.

Upon presentation, physical examination is pertinent for severe painwith

ROM of the right hip. Manual muscle testing shows 5/5 strength

throughout, except 3/5 in right hip flexion and knee extension, limited by

pain. He is unable to ambulate secondary to pain. Given the patient’s

tremendous functional limitations and lack of home supervision, he is sent

to the emergency department.While in the emergency department, plain

films of the lumbar spine, pelvis, and right hip are performed. Imaging is

only notable for mild osteoarthritis and the patient is admitted to the

hospital for further workup. Physiatry is consulted to assess for an ultra-

sound-guided right hip corticosteroid injection to treat suspected oste-

oarthritis. Upon reassessment by physiatry, osteoarthritis is thought

unlikely as the etiology of acute pain of this severity, and an injection is

deferred. Rather, an MRI of the right hip is recommended.

Setting:

Tertiary care center (outpatient, ED, inpatient).

Results:

MRI Right Hip: Nondisplaced subcapital femoral neck fracture

with moderate bone marrow edema.

Discussion:

When pain and physical exam is out of proportion to im-

aging results, alternative and missed diagnoses should be considered.

Hip radiographs have an estimated sensitivity of 90% to 95%, compared

to the sensitivity of a hip MRI of 100%. A fracture which is not obviously

evident on radiographs is likely to be nondisplaced.

Conclusions:

In patients with continuing clinical suspicion of hip frac-

ture, despite negative radiographic findings, additional imaging should

be considered. The occult hip fracture is one in which the clinical find-

ings are suggestive of a fracture but not confirmed by radiographs.

Level of Evidence:

Level V

Poster 260:

Trifid Median Nerve: A Rare Finding During Ultrasound

Guided Carpal Tunnel Injection

Michael Schaefer, MD (Cleveland Clinic Foundation), Ana M. Garcia,

MD, Jose A. Rosa Padilla, MD

Disclosures:

Michael Schaefer, MD: I Have No Relevant Financial Re-

lationships To Disclose

Case/Program Description:

A 75-year-old woman with history of

erosive osteoarthritis and right upper extremity amputation due to

sarcoma was referred to our clinic for ultrasound guided left carpal

tunnel injection. Upon evaluation the patient had chronic left hand

pain and paresthesias involving digits 1-3 and lateral half of 4th finger.

On examination there was atrophy of the thenar eminence, Phalen’s

test and Tinel’s sign were positive along with weakness of the hand

grip, thumb abduction and opposition and sensory deficits in the me-

dian nerve distribution. Electrodiagnostic studies showed severe car-

pal tunnel syndrome (CTS). During ultrasound evaluation of the volar

wrist the median nerve showed three distinct fascicles separated by

hyperechoic septa with a mean cross sectional area of 0.21 cm2 (0.5,

0.5 and 0.11 respectively). Injection of a mixture of lidocaine and

steroid medication was given deep to the radial sided fascicle.

Setting:

Outpatient Rehabilitation Clinic.

Results:

Upon follow up evaluation, the patient reported relief of her

symptoms for around 8 months.

Discussion:

Trifurcation of the median nerve has been rarely described

in the literature with only three cases reported worldwide. It can

contribute to CTS due to its anatomical configuration (higher cross

sectional area, wider configuration of nervefibers or other factors). Nerve

conduction studies may be inaccurate in this condition. Ultrasound is a

cost effective radiological method for the diagnosis of the anatomy var-

iations of the median nerve and should be considered in atypical cases.

Conclusions:

Early identification of this rare anatomic variation may

be important to avoid iatrogenic injuries due to “blind” injections or

surgical procedures.

Level of Evidence:

Level V

S214

Abstracts / PM R 9 (2017) S131-S290