Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  S219 S290 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page S219 S290 Next Page
Page Background

Poster 275:

Comprehensive Regenerative Therapies with Bone

Marrow Stem Cell, PRP and Dextrose Prolotherapy to

Treat Severe Degree of Osteoarthritis: A Case Report

Yibing Li (Center for Pain and Rehab, Peoria, IL, USA),

Katherine Cazilas, PA-C, MPAS, Jeffrey Xue, BS, student, Leah Tabor,

BS, Christina Luncsford, MA

Disclosures:

Yibing Li: I Have No Relevant Financial Relationships To

Disclose

Case/Program Description:

Ligament laxity and cartilage degenera-

tion are root causes of osteoarthritis. Dextrose prolotherapy (prolo),

platelet rich plasma (PRP) and autologous stem cell injections into the

joints and surrounding weak tendons and ligaments are effective

treatments for severe osteoarthritic conditions. Mesenchymal stem

cells (MSCs) from bone marrow aspirate with PRP and prolo were used

for 10 patients diagnosed with severe osteoarthritis, degenerative

joint disease (DJD), ligament laxity and tendinopathy by X-ray and

ultrasound or MRI, designed as alternative treatments to total joint

replacements. 7 knees, 2 wrists, 1 ankle and 2 hips were injected with

this protocol. Outcomes measured: subjective pain, function, ultra-

sound/MRI and radiographs.

Setting:

Outpatient clinic.

Results:

2 months after 1 bone marrow stem cell/PRP/prolotherapy

treatment, 3 patients reported 75-100% pain relief with improved

function, 3 patients between 50-75%, 1 patient between 25-50%, 1

patient

<

25% and 2 patients results pending. Imaging compared with

initial diagnostic scans all showed new tissue growth after 8 weeks. 1

patient with radiographic evidence of severe hip osteoarthritis prior to

injections was negative for DJD on follow up.

Discussion:

Comprehensive regenerative therapies are cutting-edge

alternatives to invasive orthopedic surgeries after failing traditional

non-surgical options. It is safe, cost-effective and low-risk for patients

who have severe DJD without the risks and downtime of surgery.

Severity of arthritis, previous surgeries, baseline health, and age

affect which patients will likely benefit from this protocol. Further

research with larger patient populations are needed to predict

outcomes.

Conclusions:

Future follow-up investigations will be completed,

addressing additional causes of pain and functional limitations. No

patients experienced any adverse reactions during or after injections.

All were able to return to work the next day.

Level of Evidence:

Level V

Poster 276:

Biologic Augmentation of a Surgically Repaired

Meniscus in an Elite High School Athlete: A Case

Report

Altamash Raja, DO (Lincoln Memorial University, Darby, Pennsylvania,

United States), Gerard A. Malanga, MD

Disclosures:

Altamash Raja: I Have No Relevant Financial Relation-

ships To Disclose

Case/Program Description:

A 17-year-old high school football player

suffered a contact injury during a game. He immediately felt lateral

sided knee pain and weakness. Initial evaluation was consistent with a

lateral meniscus tear. MRI confirmed the diagnosis. He underwent a

lateral meniscus repair for a full-thickness, high-grade radial split

lateral meniscal tear of the posterior horn and body junction. He

presented to us 4 days later for adjunctive treatment to enhance re-

covery. We implemented a treatment course of Platelet-Rich Plasma

(PRP) followed by adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) one

week later.

Setting:

Outpatient Medical Office.

Results:

At 5-weeks post treatment, pain significantly improved and

range of motion increased. By week 11, the patient reported no pain or

swelling. He was full weight-bearing, physical exam was benign. Week

13 post treatment, he reported no mechanical symptoms or swelling.

However, new complaint of mild soreness in the posterior knee,

around the lateral head of gastrocnemius. Per the surgeon, this was

likely related to suture attachment. Second look arthroscopy revealed

complete healing of the peripheral rim and body of the meniscus with

the exception of the central free edge. The free edge was trimmed

and the meniscal suture removed to decrease irritation. One week

later, the patient reported complete resolution of soreness.

Discussion:

Meniscal preservation may be a route to prevent early

arthritic changes associated with meniscal resection. In this compet-

itive athlete, PRP and adipose-derived MSCs injections were used to

enhance an arthroscopically repaired meniscus. Within 15 weeks, a

complex radial tear in a hypovascular region healed almost in its en-

tirety and allowed for return to sport.

Conclusions:

Presently, meniscal repair surgeries are infrequently

performed due to the poor intrinsic healing capabilities of these

structures. However, autologous stem cells may help increase this

healing potential. This case illustrates the potential for biologic

augmentation of current surgical procedures.

Level of Evidence:

Level V

Poster 277:

Recurrent Knee Pain in an Athlete Diagnosed by Ultrasound,

and Subsequently Treated with Combination of Percutaneous

Tenotomy, Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP), and Hydrodissection:

A Case Report

Chris Cherian, MD (Rutgers NJMS/Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation,

Newark, New Jersey, United States), Gerard A. Malanga, MD

Disclosures:

Chris Cherian: I Have No Relevant Financial Relationships

To Disclose

Case/Program Description:

This is a case of a 15-year-old female

athlete with recurrent right knee pain, who originally developed the

discomfort 3 months prior while playing basketball. She was evaluated

by a primary care physician and pediatric orthopedist, who ordered

diagnostic imaging. The x-rays were unremarkable and MRI noted a

fluid signal on the proximal patellar tendon. She underwent rest,

bracing, and physical therapy (PT). She was cleared to play, but

developed recurrent knee pain, and was referred to our office.

Setting:

Outpatient Clinic.

Results:

The physical examination revealed minimal focal patellar

swelling, without erythema, or malalignment of the right knee. The

examination was otherwise normal except for asymmetric popliteal

angles

e

10 degrees on the left, 30 degrees on the right, and focal

tenderness at the inferior pole and proximal patella tendon. Ultra-

sound revealed patellar tendinopathy, a partial tear, and a 0.80 cm

linear calcification at the inferior pole of patella tendon, with no in-

crease in power Doppler flow. The patient underwent percutaneous

tenotomy to remove the calcification, followed by PRP to assist with

healing. Post-procedure, she underwent PT and gained complete

recovery of function and relief of pain. A day prior to follow up, she

re-aggravated her injury. Repeat ultrasound revealed significant

reduction in calcification, with a small hypoechoic area representing

residual tendinosis. A significant, increased power Doppler flow in the

inferior pole of the patella tendon both within the tendon and deep to

the tendon was noted, consistent with neovessels. Hydrodissection of

the neovessels enabled the patient to return to sport participation in 2

weeks.

Discussion:

To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of missed

patella calcification diagnosed by ultrasound, and treated with com-

bination of percutaneous tenotomy, PRP, and subsequent

hydrodissection.

Conclusions:

Ultrasound is an important tool that can identify pa-

thology missed with conventional imaging, and assist with therapeutic

interventions.

Level of Evidence:

Level V

S219

Abstracts / PM R 9 (2017) S131-S290