Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  S283 S290 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page S283 S290 Next Page
Page Background

Index Measure (FIM) change of those admitted patients; Length of stay

(LOS) efficiency; discharge disposition of the admitted patients;

Results:

Twelve months before intervention (4/1/15-3/31/16), 14

trauma patients representing 4 rehabilitation impairment group

codes were admitted. On rehab discharge, they had a mean LOS of

18.3 days, mean FIM change of 30.8 points, LOS efficiency of 1.92

points/day, and disposition 50% home, and 50% to nursing home or

acute care. Twelve months after the intervention (4/1/16-3/31/17),

42 trauma patients representing 11 rehabilitation impairment group

codes were admitted. Upon discharge, they had a mean LOS of 15.7

days, mean FIM change of 38.2 points, LOS efficiency of 3 points/

day, and disposition 93.0% home, and 7% to nursing home or acute

care.

Conclusions:

Implementation of a multi-component physiatry-centric

intervention within a level one trauma system of care is associated

with a greater number and diversity of patients served, an

improvement in function per day, and more patients discharged

home. There was a statistically significant increase in: LOS efficiency

(P

¼

.025), discharge FIM (P

¼

.032) and community disposition after

discharge (P

¼

.001).

Level of Evidence:

Level IV

CATEGORY: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT

Poster 473:

The Power is in Your Hand(out)

d

Improving Patient

Compliance and Satisfaction Through Implementation of an

After-Visit Handout: A Quality Improvement Project

Jared T. Aida, DO (Loma Linda Univ, Loma Linda, CA, United States),

Mary Kim, MD, Sarah E. Humbert, MD

Disclosures:

Jared Aida: I Have No Relevant Financial Relationships To

Disclose

Objective:

To assess whether the implementation of an after-visit

handout would improve patient treatment plan compliance and pa-

tient satisfaction.

Design:

Quality improvement study.

Setting:

Outpatient musculoskeletal clinic in an academic center.

Participants:

77 patients and 14 physicians completed questionnaires

before implementing the intervention. 59 patients and 9 physicians

completed questionnaires following implementation of the intervention.

Interventions:

A two-sided handout was designed and distributed to

patients at the close of each clinic visit. On one side was a list of

various treatment options (i.e. injections, therapies, walking aids,

braces, etc.) which the physician could customize for each patient’s

treatment plan. On the other side were instructions on how to access

the aforementioned treatment options, including pertinent phone

numbers and addresses. Patients were surveyed before and following

handout usage to ascertain any changes in patient compliance or

satisfaction. Physician staff was similarly surveyed before and

following handout usage, regarding their confidence in patient

compliance to the treatment plan.

Main Outcome Measures:

An anonymous, self-reported questionnaire

consisting of Likert-type questions. Participants graded various state-

ments on a scale of 1 through 5 (1 for “strongly disagree,” 5 for

“strongly agree”). The statements acted as surrogate measures of

patient understanding and compliance of treatment plans, as well as

patient knowledge of how to access services.

Results:

All survey scores from the patient group and physician group

improved with the use of the handout. Data analysis showed statisti-

cally significant (P

<

.05) improvement in all patient measures.

Physician confidence in patients’ memory of the plan and knowledge

of how to access services also improved significantly (P

<

.05).

Conclusions:

The implementation of an after-visit handout which

outlines the customized treatment plan and directions on how to ac-

cess treatment services may result in improved patient compliance

and satisfaction. Similarly, it may improve timeliness of care and care

delivery efficiency.

Level of Evidence:

Level III

CATEGORY: GENERAL REHABILITATION

Poster 474:

Development of a Return to Work Tool for Primary

Care Providers for Low Back Pain Patients: Pilot Study

Assessment

Aishwarya Raja, BS (New York, NY, United States), Parth D. Trivedi,

MS2, Ismail Nabeel, MD

Disclosures:

Aishwarya Raja: Ownership or partnership - CatheCare

LLC

Objective:

To assess a pilot study aimed at developing return-to-work

(RTW) guidelines in the form of an accessible and adaptable Electronic

Medical Records (EMR) integrated tool.

Design:

Randomized, controlled study.

Setting:

Primary care offices.

Participants:

73 licensed PCPs who see patients over the age of 18

years, presenting with acute low back pain (LBP), and are currently

employed. PCPs were randomized with (n

¼

40) and without (n

¼

33) the

RTW guidelines.

Interventions:

We developed and integrated RTW guidelines for LBP

into Epic EMR. Personalized messages were sent to PCPs outlining

missed opportunities to offer RTW recommendations to patients pre-

senting with acute LBP.

Main Outcome Measures:

Using ICD10 codes to identify patients with

LBP, charts were data mined to assess if PCPs made recommendations

regarding RTW.

Results:

PCPs frequently encounter patients with LBP (900+ visits

related to LBP-related diagnosis and 250+ visits to lumbar-related

disorders) and use about 50 ICD10 codes to identify this diagnosis. 99.8%

of visits to the control group had not discussed the RTW option with

patients suffering from LBP while 2.8% of visits of the interventional

group had discussed this option with patients suffering from LBP. The

interventional group had a higher probability (P-value

¼

.00201784) of

recommending RTW options compared to the control group.

Conclusions:

Despite the frequency in which they treat patients with

low back pain, PCPs rarely offer RTW recommendations. Our pre-

liminary results suggest that PCPs with the integrated tool offering RTW

guidelines were more likely to provide patients with recommendations.

The pilot study underscores the importance of disseminating practice

guidelines in an accessible manner to facilitate adoption by clinicians.

The next step is to extract a subset of patient visits in order to train a

ML algorithm that will better differentiate low back pain types, such as

acute, acute on chronic, or chronic, and improve the tool’s efficacy.

Level of Evidence:

Level II

CATEGORY: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT

Poster 475:

Improving Patient Care: Resident Pocket Guide

and Handouts of Therapeutic Exercises for Common

Musculoskeletal (MSK) Disorders for Patients in an Outpatient

Indigent PM&R Clinic

Katherine Lin, MD (Jackson Mem Hosp/Jackson Hlth Sys, Miami,

Florida, United States), Huy N. Nguyen, MD, Andrew L. Sherman, MD,

FAAPMR

Disclosures:

Katherine Lin: I Have No Relevant Financial Relationships

To Disclose

S283

Abstracts / PM R 9 (2017) S131-S290