Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  S286 S290 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page S286 S290 Next Page
Page Background

discharge. Among those with a reported psychosocial health related

quality of life score, 135 had a score at baseline, 130 at admission, and

64 reported post-discharge. The cohort was between ages 4-21, pri-

marily Caucasian, male, and English speaking. Patient and family-

reported physical HRQOL improved significantly from the time of

rehabilitation admission to outpatient follow-up (mean score 20.2 to

59.7, P

<

.001). Psychosocial HRQOL improved, though to a lesser

extent (mean score 55.8 to 71.2, P

<

.001).

Conclusions:

Patient and family-reported physical and psychosocial

HRQOL, which are impacted significantly by new functional impair-

ment, are seen to improve significantly through a course of inpatient

rehabilitation. Despite significant loss to follow-up, we were able to

determine the magnitude of change was greater than the 10-point

decrement previously clinically correlated with an increase in 30-day

readmissions and emergency department return visits. Inpatient

rehabilitation is associated with important benefits for perceived

HRQOL.

Level of Evidence:

Level III

CATEGORY: NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION

Poster 481:

Alcohol Withdrawal and Early Outcomes Following Inpatient

Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury

Russell Lacey, MD (Virginia Commonwealth Univ Hlth Sys, Richmond,

VA, United States)

Disclosures:

Russell Lacey: I Have No Relevant Financial Relationships

To Disclose

Objective:

To compare inpatient rehabilitation outcomes for in-

dividuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) based on whether they were

also managed for symptoms of alcohol withdrawal during acute care.

Design:

Observational research, retrospective chart review.

Setting:

Level I trauma center, acute care and inpatient rehabilitation.

Participants:

Patients who completed inpatient rehabilitation for

moderate-to-severe TBI and who were enrolled in the TBI model sys-

tems at the study site (n

¼

234). A retrospective chart review deter-

mined which patients were managed for alcohol withdrawal using the

Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment (CIWA) protocol. Patients

were divided into two groups: TBI-only (n

¼

167) and TBI+CIWA (n

¼

67).

Interventions:

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures:

Disability Rating Scale (DRS).

Results:

The two groups were comparable with no significant differ-

ences related to initial injury severity, length of posttraumatic

amnesia (PTA), gender, years of education, acute care length of stay

(LOS), rehabilitation LOS, and DRS scores at admission to rehabilita-

tion. However, subjects in the TBI+CIWA group were significantly

(P

¼

.050) older (M

¼

45.9, SD

¼

12.3) than those in the TBI-only group

(M

¼

40.9, SD

¼

19.2). There was a significant difference between groups

for DRS scores at discharge (F(1,227)

¼

4.050, P

¼

.045), with the TBI+-

CIWA group having lower scores (M

¼

6.4, SD

¼

1.9) compared to the TBI-

only group (M

¼

7.0, SD

¼

2.2).

Conclusions:

Despite being similar on measures of initial injury

severity and functional status at admission to inpatient rehabilitation,

the TBI+CIWA group had significantly lower DRS scores (i.e., less

overall disability) at discharge compared to the TBI-only group. These

findings suggest that individuals recovering from TBI who were also

managed for alcohol withdrawal may have a more favorable initial

recovery trajectory than those with TBI-only. It is also possible that

initial injury severity indicators (e.g., PTA) may be confounded with

symptoms of alcohol withdrawal or withdrawal management resulting

in overestimation of injury severity.

Level of Evidence:

Level II

CATEGORY: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT

Poster 482:

Feasibility of an Audit System for Canadian Sonographers in

Generalist Ultrasound

Robert Dima, none (McMaster University, Grimsby, ON, Canada),

Calin Vasile, BSc Medical Science, RDMS, RVT, CRGS, CRCS, CRVS,

Vinicius Tieppo Francio, MD/PhD(c)

Disclosures:

Robert Dima: I Have No Relevant Financial Relationships

To Disclose

Objective:

To develop and assess the feasibility of a working audit

model for generalist medical sonographers in Canada. The rapid

growth and development of the dynamic field of sonography highlights

the importance to produce quantitative evidence for Canadian

sonographer’s ability in the current healthcare environment. The audit

method was employed to measure performance and identify targets of

change, setting a template for further large scale investigations which

may, in the future, influence and inform considerations involving role

expansion of sonographers in Canada.

Design:

Quantitative literature review.

Setting:

Radiological Sciences Department of a Canadian Health Care

Institution.

Participants:

429 subjects.

Interventions:

An audit method of 433 generalist ultrasound exams

was performed in the Radiological Sciences Department of a Canadian

healthcare institution. Technologist reports were contrasted with

radiologist final reports and a degree of agreement (DoA) was assigned

for each exam package by content analysis.

Main Outcome Measures:

N/A.

Results:

75% (322/429) exam packages were ranked as DoA 1 (greatest

agreement between sonographer and radiologist), 20% (86/429) were

ranked as DoA 2, 4% (16/429) were ranked as DoA 3 and 1% (5/429) were

ranked as DoA 4 (significant discrepancy between sonographer and

radiologist). No definite trends in agreement between sonographer and

radiologist based on the type of exam being performed were evident.

Conclusions:

The findings reveal good (75%) agreement between so-

nographer and radiologist on imaging findings as they are recorded in

the technical impression sheets and radiologist reports. When dis-

crepancies arise, they are usually minor and involve the omission of

incidental/additional findings by the radiologist. The methods

employed in this study may be suitable for large-scale audits of so-

nographer performance and reporting practices, as individual review

of images may present significant logistical challenges.

Level of Evidence:

Level IV

CATEGORY: PAIN & SPINE MEDICINE

Poster 483:

Immediate vs. Prolonged Pain Relief After Sacroiliac

Joint Injection with Anesthetic and Corticosteroid:

A Prospective Study

David J. Kennedy, MD (Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, United

States), Charles A. Odonkor, MD, MA, Patricia Z. Zheng, MD,

Byron J. Schneider, MD, Lisa Huynh, MD, Joshua Levin, MD,

Ramin Kordi, MD PhD

Disclosures:

David Kennedy: I Have No Relevant Financial Relation-

ships To Disclose

Objective:

To determine the relationship of immediate and short

term responses to an injection into the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) at pre-

dicting pain at 6 months.

S286

Abstracts / PM R 9 (2017) S131-S290